Tell Congress: No Beijing Veto On Video Speech

A new proposal to change copyright law could create major new restrictions on filmmakers, citizen journalists, and other creators using footage that includes “audiovisual performances.” These changes would cast a shadow of legal uncertainty over recording and using videos and inaugurate a new chokepoint on speech.

Email your representatives

? Look up your representatives

This tool uses the Smarty Streets API (why?).
If you prefer not to use our email tool, click here.

? Customize your message

As a constituent, I'm writing to oppose the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's proposed implementation of the Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances. I am deeply concerned that the proposal from the USPTO would undermine freedom of speech of filmmakers, journalists, and others creating and using video footage.

By creating new restrictions on a vague category of “performances” captured on video, this legislation would cast significant legal uncertainty over the critically important speech of filming and releasing videos. What's more, it would impose those restrictions for nearly 100 years, with liability for those who unwittingly violate them reaching to many thousands of dollars, as well as attorneys’ fees.

The proposed implementation package has been sent to Vice President Biden for consideration. It should go no further..The package greatly oversteps the limited “technical amendments” U.S. negotiators promised were necessary, subverting the intent of Congress and delegating important lawmaking decisions to executive negotiators. Please stand against this proposal.

Sincerely,

? How will EFF use this information?

Our email tool requires javascript.

If your browser doesn't support javascript or you prefer not to enable javascript on this site, you can find your legislator's contact forms via the House and Senate websites.

Sample message:

Sincerely,

The proposal aims to implement the Beijing Treaty, an international agreement that U.S. negotiators insisted would not require more than “technical amendments” to the law. But now that it's signed, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is pushing for substantial changes—changes that would create nearly a century of restrictions on vaguely defined “performances,” subject to copyright's outrageous financial damages.

We've already started to see the consequences of these changes even before they've gone into effect. In one prominent case, a judge cited the specter of the Beijing Treaty to justify censoring a newsworthy video. Changing the law could allow that kind of censorship to become much more widespread. Tell Congress today: do not adopt the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's proposed implementation of the Beijing Treaty.