Privacy

Tell San Mateo County: Stop For-Profit Tech Companies Denying Mail to Incarcerated People

Email 1

San Mateo County’s policy of digitizing and destroying physical mail sent to people in its jails violates the privacy and free expression rights of both incarcerated people and those who communicate with them. The County’s contract with Smart Communications—the company that digitizes mail sent to people in San Mateo’s jails—expires on August 31, 2024. We need your help to ensure the County doesn’t renew it: tell the County and the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office that they should let their contract with Smart Communications expire.

In 2021, San Mateo County implemented a policy banning anyone incarcerated in its jails from receiving any physical mail (other than attorney communications). Under this policy, families, friends, and supporters of people incarcerated in San Mateo jails must route their letters to Smart Communications—a private, for-profit company—which opens these letters, scans them, and then destroys the physical copy. These scans are kept for at least seven years after the intended recipient leaves the jail—and San Mateo may share them with other entities too. At the same time, incarcerated recipients’ access to these scanned letters is limited: they may only access them at certain times, through a limited number of shared tablets and kiosks in communal spaces within San Mateo’s jails.

This policy invades the free expression rights of those imprisoned in San Mateo jails and everyone who uses physical mail to correspond with them. Physical mail is a lifeline for incarcerated people: it has long been their primary means of communicating with their partners, children, religious advisors, educators, and mental health counselors—those who are often most invested in their rehabilitation. Banning it for an inadequate digital substitute thus runs counter to the criminal justice system's goal of reducing recidivism.

The County’s policy also invades the privacy of both senders and recipients of mail by enabling new and sophisticated surveillance of them. Smart Communications collects a variety of information from the mail routed to it. This information isn’t limited to these letters’ contents; it includes information not found in the mail itself, including details about the sender. The County has unfettered access to this data, and nothing in the contract with Smart Communications limits the company’s use of the information it gathers either.

In May 2023, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, and the Social Justice Legal Foundation filed a lawsuit against San Mateo County, arguing that its policy of digitizing and destroying physical mail sent to people in county jails violates provisions of the California Constitution that guarantee freedom of expression and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. Despite attempts by the county to throw out the lawsuit, the legal battle for justice continues.

Take action

Send this email:

Or send using:


To: dpine@smcgov.org, ncorzo@smcgov.org, SMC_SupMueller@smcgov.org, wslocum@smcgov.org, dcanepa@smcgov.org Subject: Stop For-Profit Tech Companies Denying Mail to Incarcerated People Dear Members of the Board of Supervisors, As your constituent, I implore you to let San Mateo’s contract with Smart Communications expire. As part of San Mateo County’s policy banning physical mail to people in its jails, Smart Communications opens, scans, and destroys the physical copies of all letters sent to those incarcerated in the County’s facilities (except for attorney mail). Incarcerated recipients may only access digital copies of letters sent from their friends, family, and supporters on shared tablets and kiosks during limited times of the day. Banning physical mail and replacing it with a digital substitute invades the free expression and privacy rights of people incarcerated in San Mateo jails and those who communicate with them. Smart Communications collects a variety of information about the senders and recipients of mail, including information like location and financial data that isn’t present in the contents of the letters themselves. That information is retained for years and may be shared with other entities, and Smart Communications has not agreed to any limitations on how it may use the information itself. Further, physical mail is a lifeline for incarcerated people; it has long been their primary means of communicating with those who are often most invested in their rehabilitation: their partners, children, religious advisors, educators, and mental health counselors. Banning it for an inadequate digital substitute not only closes off this lifeline, but runs counter to the criminal justice system's goal of reducing recidivism. For these reasons, the County should end its policy of banning physical mail and let its contract with Smart Communications expire. Thank you,
Illustration of a woman with green hair using a laptop

Thank You!

Your action is important and contributes to preserving a free, open internet.


Spread the word:

EFF is supported by donations from folks like you. We appreciate anything you can give!

Donate